From khan@xraylith.wisc.edu  Thu Oct 28 11:47:40 1999
X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["923" "Thursday" "28" "October" "1999" "11:47:38" "-0500" "Mumit Khan" "khan@xraylith.wisc.edu" nil "29" "Re: gcc-2.95 cross compiler on Linux for win32" "^From:" nil nil "10" nil nil nil nil nil]
	nil)
X-VM-Message-Order:
	(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
	 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23)
X-VM-Summary-Format: "%n %*%a %-17.17F %-3.3m %2d %4l/%-5c %I\"%s\"\n"
X-VM-Labels: ("r")
X-VM-VHeader: ("Resent-" "From:" "Sender:" "To:" "Apparently-To:" "Cc:" "Subject:" "Date:") nil
X-VM-Last-Modified: (14459 61559 636126)
X-VM-IMAP-Retrieved: nil
X-VM-POP-Retrieved: nil
X-VM-Bookmark: 1
Received: from hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu (khan@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu [128.104.182.236])
	by mail.me.umn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA66169
	for <curt@me.umn.edu>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:47:40 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from khan@xraylith.wisc.edu)
Received: from localhost (khan@localhost) by hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu with SMTP (8.7.6/8.7.1) id LAA21722 for <curt@me.umn.edu>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:47:38 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
In-Reply-To: <14360.23736.267959.788827@kenai.me.umn.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.991028114510.20029F-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.edu>
To: "Curtis L. Olson" <curt@me.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95 cross compiler on Linux for win32
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:47:38 -0500 (CDT)

On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Curtis L. Olson wrote:

> Mumit,
> 
> In the past I followed some instructions posted by you on the
> gnu-win32 mailing list in Nov, 1998 for building the cygnus tools
> under linux as a cross compiler for win32.  This all works great, but
> I'd like to upgrade to gcc-2.95.
> 
> Can I use the standard gcc-2.95 source, or do I need something
> special?  What about all the user tools and cygwin.dll and all of
> that?

The only thing change is that you'll be using gcc-2.95 instead of
egcs-1.1.x. You obviously need to get the sources to gcc-2.95.x,
get my patches against gcc-2.95, and do the same thing.

The old instructions are on my web site as well --  
http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/software/gnu-win32/

> (I find that the cygwin tools run 5-10x faster on my linux machine
> than they do on any windows machine I've tried.)

That's why I always cross-compile everything.

Regards,
Mumit



From nhv@cape.com  Thu Oct 28 12:11:43 1999
X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["264" "Thursday" "28" "October" "1999" "13:04:46" "-0400" "Norman Vine" "nhv@cape.com" nil "11" "RE: Buggy Release" "^From:" nil nil "10" nil nil nil nil nil]
	nil)
Received: from mailhub.woodsoup.org (root@anduin.physics.iastate.edu [129.186.82.1])
	by mail.me.umn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA67209
	for <curt@me.umn.edu>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 12:11:42 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from nhv@cape.com)
Received: from mx1.cape.com ([204.107.252.28])
	by mailhub.woodsoup.org with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #1)
	for curt@flightgear.org
	id 11gt5S-000DCe-00; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 12:11:42 -0500
Received: from nhv ([140.186.55.16])
	by mx1.cape.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id NAA09313
	for <curt@flightgear.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 13:11:39 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: mx1.cape.com: Host [140.186.55.16] claimed to be nhv
Reply-To: <nhv@cape.com>
Message-ID: <000001bf2167$6b745f40$1037ba8c@nhv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
In-Reply-To: <14360.29290.128100.777756@kenai.me.umn.edu>
Importance: Normal
From: "Norman Vine" <nhv@cape.com>
To: "'Curtis L. Olson'" <curt@flightgear.org>
Subject: RE: Buggy Release
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 13:04:46 -0400

Curt

Here is the link for the win32 patches for gcc-2.95
ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu-win32/cygwin/gcc-2.95/patches/

note that this is against 2.95 not 2.95.1 or 2.95.2


But it looks like you do not need it yet in light of the -g switch fix

Norman

